Kihealth Europe
Bright European clinical research laboratory with scientists reviewing samples

A platform engineered for regulatory, payer and clinical review

InterceptIQ™ has been evaluated across analytical performance categories and benchmarked against prospective clinical cohorts. The data below summarise the studies anchoring the platform's scientific credibility, with acceptance criteria pre-specified prior to unblinding to preserve statistical integrity.

Headline performance across every validation pillar

Reference data developed by Kihealth under accredited laboratory standards, with method comparison against orthogonal ddPCR.

Linearity (R²)
PASS
0.9999

0.5 – 5,000 cp/µL

Limit of Detection
PASS
4.5 cp/µL

95% probability · Probit

Diagnostic AUC
PASS
0.979

T1D vs. control · n ≈ 1,847

Inter-run CV
PASS
3.2%

28 days · 4 operators

Specificity
PASS
97.8%

At calibrated cutoff

Sensitivity
PASS
94.6%

At calibrated cutoff

Performance rendered visually

Selected figures from the analytical and clinical validation dossier. Each chart is a simplified rendering of the underlying study data; full source tables and audit logs are available on request.

Diagnostic ROC
1 − SpecificitySensitivityAUC 0.979

T1D vs. control · n ≈ 1,847

Linearity
Expected (cp/µL, log scale)ObservedR² 0.9999

0.5 – 5,000 cp/µL · 4-log range

Inter-run Precision
2%4%6%Acceptance ≤ 5%D1D3D7D14D21D28Inter-run CV

28 days · 4 operators

Cohort Distribution
153306459612Adult T1D612Paediatric T1D540T2D384Controls311Participants (n)

Reference cohorts (n ≈ 1,847)

Pre-defined acceptance criteria — met or exceeded

The InterceptIQ™ assay was evaluated in accordance with CLSI guidance and internal protocols developed for regulatory submission. Acceptance thresholds were pre-specified before unblinding.

Accuracy

Bias < 2% across operating range

Precision

Inter-run CV 1.6% – 5.4%

Linearity

R² = 0.9999 over a 4-log dynamic range

Specificity

No cross-reactivity in 96-sample panel

Recovery

98.1% – 102.4% spike recovery

Stability

≥ 7 days · plasma stored at 4 °C

Limit of Detection

4.5 copies / µL · 95% Probit

Reference Range

Established across 3 cohorts (n ≈ 1,847)

Active and pending clinical studies

A snapshot of the studies currently generating evidence for InterceptIQ™ and BetaIntercept™, spanning academic medical centres, national registries and biobank partners.

6 Active
2 Pending
INS cfDNA in new-onset diabetes
Active
Nemours
New-onset diabetes vs. controls
β-cell cfDNA early detection (DAISY)
Active
UC Anschutz
Stage 1–3 T1D + controls
cfDNA progression biomarker (TEDDY)
Pending
TEDDY Biobank
Genetic-risk children
Beta First™ validation
Active
University of Florida
Early/recent-onset T1D
Multiomic liquid biopsy (PDAC)
Active
UC Anschutz
New-onset diabetes; PDAC high-risk
Human and de-identified biospecimens
Active
Kihealth / BioIVT
Volunteer donors
De-identified residual testing samples
Active
Kihealth
Residual test samples
INS cfDNA in new-onset diabetes
Pending
USF / Tampa General
New-onset diabetes vs. controls
Clinical scientists reviewing validation data in a modern laboratory

Benchmarked against prospective cohorts

BetaIntercept™ T1 has been studied in a paediatric prospective cohort where the assay reported 87% sensitivity and 85% specificity for Stage-3 T1D classification, with an AUC of 0.904. In retrospective analyses, the assay was associated with a median lead-time of up to 625 days versus standard-of-care HbA1c diagnosis.

These figures are reference research findings and are intended to support continued evaluation in larger, multi-site European cohorts. They are not yet authorised claims for routine clinical diagnosis in the European Union.

Ongoing work being investigated in Europe includes prospective enrolment with academic medical centres, biobank-enabled retrospective analyses, and method-comparison studies with orthogonal molecular techniques.

Reviewing evidence for a study, regulatory submission, or payer dossier?